I hope wikileaks gets a hold of the messages to see how such a deal gets done.
Well, in a nutshell, John posted that he wasn't going for it this year, I inquired about one of his rentals, then before he answered I proposed the first blockbuster that would see me getting Stamkos and Malkin. John summarily rejected my proposal and said that Reinhart needed to be coming his way to consider doing a deal with me, and listed Bjorkstrand and Point as the other prospects I had that he wanted. From there, we had a framework and it was just a matter of making the money work, there wasn't any negotiation about the minor players, they were just necessarily throw ins for cap compliance. John tacked the 4th round pick into one of his counters and I just thought it was funny so I left it in my final counter, which was accepted.
Ya, I would agree with that. My fallback for easiest to deal with is always Dubey, but honestly, I cant think of anyone in the FCHL I have found difficult to deal with. Even when we're way off (and JOhn+I kind of were on this one), its really smooth and cordial, and its kind of like "whatever, we dont agree, good luck". In other pools, everyone gets all bent out of shape
__________________
Rich, 1-30-2020: "Arp is showing the kind of grit that most Millennials lack. His team stinks but he's still scrapping it out. It's inspiring."
Blindsides 1.5 vs. Whalers 1.0 Newmarket Hurricanes 4.0 vs. Iowa Crop Dusters 3.5 Toronto Rocket 4.0 vs. KC Reserves 3.0 Tulane Flyers 1.0 vs. Injured Reserve 6.0 Lost Cause 1.5 vs. BlackDevilHawks 0.0 asdfjkl; 1.0 vs. Lethbridge Golden Seals 0.5 Royal Oak Fearsome Beavers 0.0 vs. Broadway 3.0 The Ales 4.5 vs. Newmarket Hurricanes 4.0
Blindsides 1.5 vs. Whalers 1.0 Newmarket Hurricanes 4.0 vs. Iowa Crop Dusters 3.5 Toronto Rocket 4.0 vs. KC Reserves 3.0 Tulane Flyers 1.0 vs. Injured Reserve 6.0 Lost Cause 1.5 vs. BlackDevilHawks 0.0 asdfjkl; 1.0 vs. Lethbridge Golden Seals 0.5 Royal Oak Fearsome Beavers 0.0 vs. Broadway 3.0 The Ales 4.5 vs. Newmarket Hurricanes 4.0
Well I guess this makes me top of the league for one game I guess :)
Blindsides 1.5 vs. Whalers 1.0 Newmarket Hurricanes 4.0 vs. Iowa Crop Dusters 3.5 Toronto Rocket 4.0 vs. KC Reserves 3.0 Tulane Flyers 1.0 vs. Injured Reserve 6.0 Lost Cause 1.5 vs. BlackDevilHawks 0.0 asdfjkl; 1.0 vs. Lethbridge Golden Seals 0.5 Royal Oak Fearsome Beavers 0.0 vs. Broadway 3.0 The Ales 4.5 vs. Newmarket Hurricanes 4.0
Well I guess this makes me top of the league for one game I guess :)
Blindsides 1.5 vs. Whalers 1.0 Newmarket Hurricanes 4.0 vs. Iowa Crop Dusters 3.5 Toronto Rocket 4.0 vs. KC Reserves 3.0 Tulane Flyers 1.0 vs. Injured Reserve 6.0 Lost Cause 1.5 vs. BlackDevilHawks 0.0 asdfjkl; 1.0 vs. Lethbridge Golden Seals 0.5 Royal Oak Fearsome Beavers 0.0 vs. Broadway 3.0 The Ales 4.5 vs. Newmarket Hurricanes 4.0
Well I guess this makes me top of the league for one game I guess :)
No, see...there's a formula...
Hey, my methodology is there for all to see. Poke holes in it, please, so it can be fine tuned and improved. I'm sure there are MANY. :)
Rich, you are like the David Price of the FCHL. A regular season wunderkind, but once the postseason starts...
Can you answer my question please?
It left me feeling concussed.
I can translate.
Jay, when Rich asked you how his ass tastes, it was his way of mocking the fact that your vastly superior team was marginally defeated by his noticeably inferior lineup in Wednesday night's matchup between your two teams.
The appropriate responses would be "I would have no way of knowing, but I know who you can ask" "like Mom's fried chicken" or "kind of ****ty"...it's really personal preference as to the verbiage, humor content and tone of your response.
Ha! Or I could flip it around and subtlety remind him that his star player who is earning 40% of his payroll is one hit away from stunt doubling Stephen Hawking on The Big Bang Theory.
By no means does my previous post mean I wish ill will on anyone's players or their immediate families. Also, I have tremendous respect for Stephen Hawking.