(1) Toronto Rocket vs. (4) Newmarket Hurricanes Toronto Rockets lead series 2-1
Game 1: Toronto Rocket 1.5 vs. Newmarket Hurricanes 5.0 Game 2: Toronto Rocket 6.5 vs. Newmarket Hurricanes 1.0 Game 3: Toronto Rocket 7.0 vs. Newmarket Hurricanes 0.5 Game 4: Toronto Rocket vs. Newmarket Hurricanes Game 5: Toronto Rocket vs. Newmarket Hurricanes *Game 6: Toronto Rocket vs. Newmarket Hurricanes *Game 7: Toronto Rocket vs. Newmarket Hurricanes
(2) asdfjkl; vs. (3) Iowa Crop Dusters asdfjkl; lead series tied 2-1
Game 1: asdfjkl; 4.5 vs. Iowa Crop Dusters 6.5 Game 2: asdfjkl; 3.0 vs. Iowa Crop Dusters 2.0 Game 3: asdfjkl; 3.0 vs. Iowa Crop Dusters 1.0 Game 4: asdfjkl; vs. Iowa Crop Dusters Game 5: asdfjkl; vs. Iowa Crop Dusters *Game 6: asdfjkl; vs. Iowa Crop Dusters *Game 7: asdfjkl; vs. Iowa Crop Dusters
MrDannyG Memorial Tournament
(9) Lost Cause vs. (14) Blindsides Lost Cause lead series 2-1
Game 1: Lost Cause 0.5 vs. Blindsides 2.0 Game 2: Lost Cause 3.0 vs. Blindsides 0.0 Game 3: Lost Cause 1.5 vs. Blindsides 0.0 Game 4: Lost Cause vs. Blindsides Game 5: Lost Cause vs. Blindsides *Game 6: Lost Cause vs. Blindsides *Game 7: Lost Cause vs. Blindsides
(10) Royal Oak Fearsome Beavers vs. (13) Lethbridge Golden Seals Fearsome Beavers lead series 2-1
Game 1: Fearsome Beavers 3.5 vs. Golden Seals (-1.0) Game 2: Fearsome Beavers 1.5 vs. Golden Seals (-1.0) Game 3: Fearsome Beavers 2.0 vs. Golden Seals 3.5 Game 4: Fearsome Beavers vs. Golden Seals Game 5: Fearsome Beavers vs. Golden Seals *Game 6: Fearsome Beavers vs. Golden Seals *Game 7: Fearsome Beavers vs. Golden Seals
1. Sidney Crosby 2. T. J. Oshie 3. Artemi Panarin 4. Logan Couture 4. Jeff Skinner 6. Aleksander Barkov 7. Dougie Hamilton 8. Rasmus Ristolainen 9. Jared Spurgeon 10. Mark Streit G. San Jose
-- Edited by Zach6668 on Tuesday 21st of March 2017 02:53:14 PM
-- Edited by Zach6668 on Tuesday 21st of March 2017 06:44:47 PM
1. Patrick Kane
2. Joe Pavelski
3. Kyle Palmieri
4. Jakub Voracek
5. Mats Zuccarello
6. Justin Faulk
7. Shayne Gostisbehere
8. Marian Hossa
9. Mike Green
10. Dion Phaneuf
1. Brad Marchand
2. Vladimir Tarasenko
3. Max Pacioretty
4. Brent Burns
5. Mikko Koivu
6. Wayne Simmonds
7. Torey Krug
8. John Carlson
9. JT Miller
10. Zdeno Chara
cant help but notice that Biatch just keeps putting up solid scores (nearly?) every night.
Well done Dan, analytics certainly were wrong about you. Or, you're just even luckier than we thought! :)
GL guys, winners seem to keep up big scores, Im not feeling at all like I would have been worthy of this final 4. Good show.
__________________
Rich, 1-30-2020: "Arp is showing the kind of grit that most Millennials lack. His team stinks but he's still scrapping it out. It's inspiring."
cant help but notice that Biatch just keeps putting up solid scores (nearly?) every night. Well done Dan, analytics certainly were wrong about you. Or, you're just even luckier than we thought! :)
GL guys, winners seem to keep up big scores, Im not feeling at all like I would have been worthy of this final 4. Good show.
I don't really get it. His projected scores, which are solely based on the performance of his players this season, are always like a goal less than everyone else.
At first I was like, oh, did I spell Ovechkin wrong? Maybe it's missing his big gun, but I can't find anything wrong with the spreadsheet.
So I have 2 possible scenarios I can think of.
1 - Biatch's players universally slumped for much of the regular season, but he got lucky to win a lot early on - he ended up with a solid average score in the end, but it started out quite low, despite him winning games - so I think it's possible his guys turned it around at the right time, and later in the season, so maybe those guys are playing a ~3.5 average score level now, but the stats are skewed by massive slumps previously in the season so it looks like his average score should be ~2.5.
2 - The second scenario is that my model is flawless and Biatch is just running hot as hell. :D
But like, on paper, his team looks strong as hell. I think a big part was Toews was not scoring at all earlier in the season, now he's probably the hottest scorer in the league. Thornton picked it up quite a bit since Biatch traded for him too, I think. Probably others.
Is your projected scores based on PPG? Maybe there are some other stats better then PPG?
Yes, but points are the only thing we use to decide winners and losers, so, theoretically, in the long run, it should even out.
It's definitely a crude guess, because hot streaks, matchups, etc play in to what, say, a bookie would set a line at, but that wouldn't explain consistently performing above expectation for a long period of time.
Addng Toews right before he got super hot probably explains a large portion of this all, tbh.
Adam's missed his lineup but still has time to cover some of the empty spots. I tried to text him but got a bounce back, might be that I have his old number or that a text from Australia to the US via a UK phone is too much for my phone network!
It's so frustrating when you build something just for this stretch of games and then go cold at the wrong time. Games of 1, 0.5, and 1. Good game Zach.
It's so frustrating when you build something just for this stretch of games and then go cold at the wrong time. Games of 1, 0.5, and 1. Good game Zach.
I know the feeling well.
Ty.
Back at it on Thursday. You guys should have a team meeting. It ain't over, that's for sure.
(1) Toronto Rocket vs. (4) Newmarket Hurricanes Toronto Rockets lead series 3-1
Game 1: Toronto Rocket 1.5 vs. Newmarket Hurricanes 5.0 Game 2: Toronto Rocket 6.5 vs. Newmarket Hurricanes 1.0 Game 3: Toronto Rocket 7.0 vs. Newmarket Hurricanes 0.5 Game 4: Toronto Rocket 4.0 vs. Newmarket Hurricanes 1.5 Game 5: Toronto Rocket vs. Newmarket Hurricanes *Game 6: Toronto Rocket vs. Newmarket Hurricanes *Game 7: Toronto Rocket vs. Newmarket Hurricanes
(2) asdfjkl; vs. (3) Iowa Crop Dusters asdfjkl; lead series tied 3-1
Game 1: asdfjkl; 4.5 vs. Iowa Crop Dusters 6.5 Game 2: asdfjkl; 3.0 vs. Iowa Crop Dusters 2.0 Game 3: asdfjkl; 3.0 vs. Iowa Crop Dusters 1.0 Game 4: asdfjkl; 2.0 vs. Iowa Crop Dusters 1.0 Game 5: asdfjkl; vs. Iowa Crop Dusters *Game 6: asdfjkl; vs. Iowa Crop Dusters *Game 7: asdfjkl; vs. Iowa Crop Dusters
MrDannyG Memorial Tournament
(9) Lost Cause vs. (14) Blindsides Series tied 2-2
Game 1: Lost Cause 0.5 vs. Blindsides 2.0 Game 2: Lost Cause 3.0 vs. Blindsides 0.0 Game 3: Lost Cause 1.5 vs. Blindsides 0.0 Game 4: Lost Cause (-2.0) vs. Blindsides 0.5 Game 5: Lost Cause vs. Blindsides Game 6: Lost Cause vs. Blindsides *Game 7: Lost Cause vs. Blindsides
(10) Royal Oak Fearsome Beavers vs. (13) Lethbridge Golden Seals Series tied 2-2
Game 1: Fearsome Beavers 3.5 vs. Golden Seals (-1.0) Game 2: Fearsome Beavers 1.5 vs. Golden Seals (-1.0) Game 3: Fearsome Beavers 2.0 vs. Golden Seals 3.5 Game 4: Fearsome Beavers 1.0 vs. Golden Seals 2.0 Game 5: Fearsome Beavers vs. Golden Seals Game 6: Fearsome Beavers vs. Golden Seals *Game 7: Fearsome Beavers vs. Golden Seals
Sorry about the miss guys, I'm not sure what happened there. I know I did a lineup for the game but for some reason it didn't save...very strange. Thanks to Ollie and Zach for reaching out, I appreciate it.
lol in the AHL, if I went with Calgary goalies. I would have lost by 0.5. But then with this scoring change, I would have tied Dale and won in OT. That would have been hilarious.
__________________
“imo it’s an optimal strategy for someone lazy like me, who tries to get the most out the least possible effort”