It seems unlikely that the Whalers will lose to the Flyers tonight. Assuming he wins, the Gilmour could be very interesting. Game 79 for the Whalers is vs Broadway, while the Rockets get the IR. Should the Whalers win and the Rockets lose (and assuming the Rockets beat the Ales tonight), the division will come down to game 80, where the Rockets and Whalers go head to head.
Basically, any scenario where the Whalers gain one point on the Rockets in games 78 and 79 set up a winner take the division game on Tuesday.
I'm just tired of battling against all the people who want to make changes just to make changes. Tired of being the one who says no because I like it the way it is.
I felt like my suggestion had a lot more than just "lets make changes just to make changes", but ok. I'm not suggesting I'm bored with the 4-5 matchup, I'm saying it goes against the point of the league as I see it.
__________________
Rich, 1-30-2020: "Arp is showing the kind of grit that most Millennials lack. His team stinks but he's still scrapping it out. It's inspiring."
It seems unlikely that the Whalers will lose to the Flyers tonight. Assuming he wins, the Gilmour could be very interesting. Game 79 for the Whalers is vs Broadway, while the Rockets get the IR. Should the Whalers win and the Rockets lose (and assuming the Rockets beat the Ales tonight), the division will come down to game 80, where the Rockets and Whalers go head to head.
Basically, any scenario where the Whalers gain one point on the Rockets in games 78 and 79 set up a winner take the division game on Tuesday.
while it probably wont matter anyway, I'm pretty sure I don't have goalies for that last game of the year.
__________________
Rich, 1-30-2020: "Arp is showing the kind of grit that most Millennials lack. His team stinks but he's still scrapping it out. It's inspiring."
I'm just tired of battling against all the people who want to make changes just to make changes. Tired of being the one who says no because I like it the way it is.
I felt like my suggestion had a lot more than just "lets make changes just to make changes", but ok. I'm not suggesting I'm bored with the 4-5 matchup, I'm saying it goes against the point of the league as I see it.
I think adding the pick your own opponent rewards those who do their research. It rewards strategy and adds to the skill of the league.
I can tell you right now, I am too lazy to do the research, and won't do as much as Zach. But if he is willing to do that extra work, he should be rewarded and have that advantage available to him. I don't think it's just as easy as picking who finishes #8.
You would look at:
- goalie nights for your opponents
- short nights for your opponents
- key injuries to your opponents
There's so many variables. I think it would add a nice dynamic to our league. And make it more skill based rather than luck based.
__________________
“imo it’s an optimal strategy for someone lazy like me, who tries to get the most out the least possible effort”
It seems unlikely that the Whalers will lose to the Flyers tonight. Assuming he wins, the Gilmour could be very interesting. Game 79 for the Whalers is vs Broadway, while the Rockets get the IR. Should the Whalers win and the Rockets lose (and assuming the Rockets beat the Ales tonight), the division will come down to game 80, where the Rockets and Whalers go head to head.
Basically, any scenario where the Whalers gain one point on the Rockets in games 78 and 79 set up a winner take the division game on Tuesday.
while it probably wont matter anyway, I'm pretty sure I don't have goalies for that last game of the year.
Well that's fortunate. Looks like our F and D are both pretty stacked, though. And my goalies play two pretty offensive teams (VGK and PIT), so no goalies could be an advantage! haha.
I think adding the pick your own opponent rewards those who do their research. It rewards strategy and adds to the skill of the league.
I can tell you right now, I am too lazy to do the research, and won't do as much as Zach. But if he is willing to do that extra work, he should be rewarded and have that advantage available to him. I don't think it's just as easy as picking who finishes #8.
You would look at: - goalie nights for your opponents - short nights for your opponents - key injuries to your opponents
There's so many variables. I think it would add a nice dynamic to our league. And make it more skill based rather than luck based.
I already do all of the work required to make this decision, to be honest. I even have provisions for injuries, but I haven't factored them in yet this season.
I kind of like the idea, but I don't care all that much.
I'm just tired of battling against all the people who want to make changes just to make changes. Tired of being the one who says no because I like it the way it is.
I felt like my suggestion had a lot more than just "lets make changes just to make changes", but ok. I'm not suggesting I'm bored with the 4-5 matchup, I'm saying it goes against the point of the league as I see it.
My comment wasn't aimed at you at all.
:)
my bad!
__________________
Rich, 1-30-2020: "Arp is showing the kind of grit that most Millennials lack. His team stinks but he's still scrapping it out. It's inspiring."
I'm fine with all the seeding options including the current approach, I just think Dan's idea had a lot of potential. On top of goalie and player coverage, it also allows the 1 seed to try to play an opponent when they are vulnerable. Imagine a season where the top 2 seeds are way better than everyone else. The 1 seed gets to choose what round they play the 2 seed in. Add in the trash talk and emotion of it and it could be a lot of fun.
Ooh, are we talking about selecting second round opponents too?
That adds a whole other variable to the equation. I know if I want to win, I've gotta go through X. X is at their weakest in round 1, maybe we should just get it out of the way early?
Ooh, are we talking about selecting second round opponents too?
That adds a whole other variable to the equation. I know if I want to win, I've gotta go through X. X is at their weakest in round 1, maybe we should just get it out of the way early?
Yes, it would be every round. After the first round, the highest seed would get choice again.
You are right in your second sentence, it adds a whole new layer to our league, which I think would make it a lot more fun & strategic.
__________________
“imo it’s an optimal strategy for someone lazy like me, who tries to get the most out the least possible effort”
That's the name of the trophy. If you search "Rubbish" on this site you'll find the picture Dubey made, I tried to port it over here but it wasn't happening on mobile.
Whalers vs. Tulane Flyers Blindsides vs. Newmarket Hurricanes Injured Reserve vs. Lost Cause Toronto Rocket vs. The Ales Iowa Crop Dusters vs. Broadway Royal Oak Fearsome Beavers vs. asdfjkl; BlackDevilHawks vs. Lethbridge Golden Seals KC Reserves vs. Blindsides
Welp...
Rockets will win, Whalers will win. No movement on the division there, but the magic number drops to 2.
LGS in good shape. Should lock up $100 tonight.
KCR Reserves should clinch their division.
Barring a big night from Seguin, Dusters will clinch.
Asdfjkl; going to win, IR going to lose. We'll have a tie for 8th.
Whalers 3.5 vs. Tulane Flyers -0.5 Blindsides 0.5 vs. Newmarket Hurricanes 3.5 Injured Reserve 2.0 vs. Lost Cause 7.0 Toronto Rocket 6.0 vs. The Ales -1.5 Iowa Crop Dusters 5.5 vs. Broadway 3.5 Royal Oak Fearsome Beavers 0.0 vs. asdfjkl; 3.0 BlackDevilHawks 0.0 vs. Lethbridge Golden Seals 3.0 KC Reserves 1.0 vs. Blindsides 0.5